Apex Court Sets the Stage for ISL, Reserves Verdict on AIFF Constitution

By order dated September 1, 2025, the Supreme Court laid to rest mounting concerns over the upcoming Indian Super League (ISL) season, setting the stage for its commencement.[1]

The matter arises from the pending renewal of the 15-year Master Rights Agreement (MRA) dated December 9, 2010, between the All-India Football Federation (AIFF) and its commercial partner, Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL), which is due to expire in December 2025. Pursuant to earlier directions from the Court restraining the AIFF from entering into binding contracts until a verdict on its draft constitution was delivered, the parties were unable to decide the terms on which the ISL could be conducted. This deadlock left clubs in a challenging position.

Although judgment on the primary matter was reserved in April 2025, the case was subsequently relisted following the enactment of the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, and to address uncertainties surrounding the upcoming seasons of various football leagues, including the ISL.

On August 22, the Court directed AIFF and FSDL to discuss and come up with a workable arrangement for the smooth functioning of the leagues. Within a week, the parties submitted a joint proposal providing for commencement of the 2025-26 season with the Super Cup, completion of the tender process for selection of a commercial partner by October 15, and commencement of the new league season by December 2025 (subject to consent of the Asian Football Confederation).

The Court accepted the proposal and emphasised the timely commencement of the football calendar and the maintenance of competitive continuity for the 2025-2026 season, directing AIFF to take necessary measures for the same. It further directed AIFF to issue tenders inviting bids for an open, competitive and transparent process for selection of its commercial partner to conduct the ISL. To oversee this process, the Court appointed former Supreme Court judge Justice L. Nageswara Rao to ensure that a competent and reputable firm is identified in accordance with global best practices.

In relation to the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, the Court noted concerns raised regarding autonomy, the lack of clarity over tenure limitations and the maximum age to contest elections in National Sports Federations. It indicated that these submissions would be considered before finalisation of its decision on the draft constitution.

[1] All India Football Federation v. Rahul Mehra and Ors. [SLP(C) Nos.30748-30749/2017].