
Counterfeiting: IndiaMART not Entitled to Safe Harbour Protection
Recently, it was held that IndiaMART was not entitled to safe harbour protection as it did not comply with the due diligence requirements.

Recently, it was held that IndiaMART was not entitled to safe harbour protection as it did not comply with the due diligence requirements.

A critic of the Delhi High Court Order in Samridhi enterprises vs Flipkart Internet Private Ltd. – Obligation of Intermediaries to Pursue Complaints Against Infringers.

The recently notified Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023 introduces new due-diligence requirements for intermediaries.
The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner.
This website is meant solely for the purpose of providing general information and not for advertising or soliciting any work whether directly or indirectly. By accessing this website, www.foxmandal.in, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Fox Mandal of your own accord. Further, any content provided in this website should not be construed as legal advice. We disclaim all liability for any consequences of any action taken by the user relying on content provided on the website.
By clicking on the “I Accept” button, the user acknowledges that:
To learn more about how we use cookies, please read our Privacy Policy